Free to Play Vanguard: Why?

As anyone reading this blog should already know, Vanguard is going free to play (freemium) some time this summer. Details are mostly still pending, but the major variables are the details of the model, the exact launch date and the content package that SOE is going to release alongside it. The big picture, though, points to a healthier game after all is said and done.

A couple of SOE MMOs have gone away lately. The big one is/was SWG, of course, but you can’t necessarily say that was shut down because SOE wanted it shut down. But there’s also EverQuest Online Adventures, shuttered at the end of last month, and that’s a call that can most certainly be laid at the doorstep of Smed and the people making the decisions at SOE.

SOE does not seem to me to be a daring company. I know that they considered launching a freemium server for EQ2, their most popular title at the time, to be a big risk, but viewed from the outside it was anything but. The success that SOE has claimed for it and the subsequent total conversion of EQ2 to freemium looks like it was inevitable to me. Too, their freemium model is very conservative, aimed at giving free and microtransaction players a good taste of the game and allowing for casual play but definitively steering them towards a subscription if they want to play seriously.

SOE has some projects in the pipeline that are big and expensive by its standards. Planetside 2 is headed to release probably next year, with a whole new engine that SOE designed in-house. EverQuest Next, which will share that engine, is further out, and is the third (well, fifth, but you know what I mean) installment in their flagship franchise. If they’re not going all-out with it, they’re making a huge strategic error. Big money spent elsewhere is often accompanied by cuts in marginal corners of the business.

Vanguard had been allowed to wither on the vine by SOE for a long time. We started seeing very modest updates last year, and those have ramped up lately, but there was a period of over two years where not a single update of any kind was forthcoming. Not just no new content, but not even bug fixes. The only updates were to patch in holiday events and to fix server issues that actually took the game down. During this period there was very little indication that SOE had any interest in Vanguard at all. A few statements were made here and there that the company was still behind the game, but not often, and words are empty without action anyway. FanFaire was barren of even offhand talk of Vanguard for two years.

So here we have a game with the clear appearance of being unloved by its publisher, with a visibly minuscule player population, in a period when cancellation would have surprised absolutely no one and would seem to make sense on the face of it for a number of reasons. Yet Vanguard, despite all this, and despite the proclamations by naysayers that shutdown is right around the corner, gets a new lease on life this summer. Why? I can think of four possible reasons:

  1. SOE is run by idiots, and is chasing bad money with good. There are people who believe this, but I don’t, and the idea is terminally rebutted, in my opinion, by the conservatism I mentioned above. Conservatism doesn’t imply good sense, but if there’s one thing SOE cannot be accused of, it’s throwing money around willy-nilly.
  2. Vanguard is doing better than is generally supposed. While this is possible, there isn’t a shred of evidence to support it. There may be some percentage of people maintaining active subscriptions who don’t log in very often, but I’m inclined to think that this number is very small. Vanguard does add value to the SOE All Access Pass, but SOE appears to be moving (haltingly) away from the subscription model as the primary means of revenue, and their entire catalog (save only Planetside) going free to play makes non-subbing more attractive to those, like me, who like more than one of their games but tend to dabble in them.
  3. The change may have been forced by the terms of the deal with ProSiebenSat, whereby SOE agreed to move all their games to freemium as part of the arrangement. It’s hard for me to credit the idea that Vanguard could have been leveraged in this way by ProSiebenSat, nor would this theory explain why Planetside is, as far as we know, staying on the sub model. The latest word (as of yesterday) on the incredibly unpopular ProSeibenSat deal is that Vanguard (and EQ) will not be included in the arrangement at all. So nothing to see here.
  4. Vanguard is doing as badly as is commonly supposed, but the team at SOE really does believe in its viability as a product, and recognizes that a big part of the reason it’s doing so poorly is simply the neglect they have lavished upon it. Based on my understanding of SOE as a company, and of the people involved, I think that this is the most likely scenario. I think there are people at SOE invested in Vanguard who care about it and its survival and future direction. But note that caring doesn’t guarantee success.

Vanguard fans have rejoiced at the news, by and large. Oh, there’s been some of the typical anti-f2p and anti-SOE grumbling, but mostly it’s getting drowned out. I’m also seeing a surprising number of people saying that they’ve resubscribed already just based on the news alone, although I can’t say that there’s been a meaningful impact on in-game populations, at least yet (but bear in mind that I play at weird hours, too.) Words like “renaissance,” “revival,” “relaunch” and “second chance” (and “last chance,” too, which can’t be argued with,) are getting thrown around, not entirely without justification. I worry that words like these imply more optimism than is warranted.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m optimistic, too. And there’s a lot of space overhead, if you take my meaning. But we shouldn’t pretend that Vanguard’s history doesn’t leave substantial cause for pessimism. The game is also coming to the freemium market rather late โ€” a market that is now quite crowded. I think we will, even in the direst case, see a significant uptick in players in Telon, and it’s my hope that it gets some attention from people who would like the game if they gave it a chance. But how big the increase will be is an open question. Predictions of new servers opening up, for example, are premature, to say the least.

On the other hand, one of the limits of the technology behind Vanguard may actually prove to be a backhanded asset in this respect; unlike EQ2, which is heavily zoned and which spawns new instances of zones is response to heavy population in those areas, Vanguard is uninstanced except in one raid dungeon, and that’s limited to six copies. All players are right out in the same world, and SOE doesn’t have the ability to stack a finite but very large number of active players onto the same Vanguard server. A tenfold increase in active players, which is not at all unbelievable, might well trigger the launch of a new server. And that would be the “holy cow, the Vanguard Renaissance is real” moment for a lot of people who might otherwise doubt it.

6 responses to “Free to Play Vanguard: Why?

  1. The world is soo big that, I think, even with a significant boost in adventurers, Vanguard can still have that coveted single-server feel (a la Eve). I’m seeing players all over Telon but there is room for a lot more. Imagine a chain of groups in Trengal Keep or a dozen boats docked outside Ahgram (like the ol’ days).

  2. I’m with you on the reason Vanguard has hung on despite all logic. I think there are two emotional factors behind its survival. One is the genuine belief in the game that you cite. Smed and Brad did co-create Everquest (along with several others) and Vanguard absolutely is the real successor to that game, much more so than EQ2 has ever been. Smed brought Vanguard into SOE at the earliest opportunity he had, first with a distribution deal and then by buying the thing outright when Sigil went down in flames. If they haven’t developed it to its full potential since, I don’t believe its from a lack of interest or belief. I think they’ve had enough problems trying to keep the rest of their games and the company afloat.

    The second emotional factor is probably SOE’s deserved reputation for not closing MMOs. They really don’t like to do it. It’s about the one thing they still get credit for and I believe it’s important to their view of who they are as a company. Would any other MMO house their size have kept EQOA running for 9 years? Or left EQMAC up for free?

    Sony itself is in deep waters and has been for a long while. Back before EQ2X became the big hit it was and SOE finally seemed to have found some traction in the MMO gamespace again, I often wondered whether we’d see the whole company closed down. At least now SOE stands a chance of being worth selling rather than just closing when Sony finally notices it exists. Whether you like or loathe the F2P/Freemium model, if you have any interest in playing SOE MMOs for a few more years you should probably be grateful for it.

  3. Pingback: Quote of the Day « Bio Break

  4. Why hasn’t Vanguard closed down, yet? My assumption is a simple financial one: Operations cost are so minuscule compared to development cost.

    Now they are putting in a task force to get the game F2P ready, say half a year with perhaps 20 people max. (Wild guess at cost: $2 mil) Not a big deal, compared to an average development time of 2-4 years and way bigger teams, especially art teams, writing staff and costliest of all, voice acting. It shouldn’t be to hard to recover the extra development cost.

  5. I think you can get at the “why” by addressing the “how” – because this is a for-profit company, we can take as a given that someone made a successful (if not necessarily accurate) case that more revenue would follow the relaunch. Where is the potential money coming from? There’s only 2-3 possible options.

    – Existing players: In principle, the new model “frees” the true believers to spend more than the $15/month. It’s also possible that the Station Pass is currently mucking up the accounting in terms of how revenue is credited to individual games. With a Vanguard-specific Station Store, Vanguard’s sales are its revenue, period. However, note that these numbers need to be docked by lost revenue for any current subscribers who manage to pay less under the new version.

    – New and Returning players: In here, we have several subcategories of revenue. There will be a one-time surge when the game re-launches as players unlock classes, races, etc to try out the game. The real questions are in how many stick around, and how much they spend.

    Vanguard already had a pretty low entry barrier – a free trial (albeit limited to the accursed isle) and no box fee if you opted to subscribe (along with a massive discount if you already subscribed to other SOE games). The thing that makes me wonder about SOE’s thinking is that it would seem to take a lot of new blood to recoup any substantial investment if the thinking is that these new customers will be paying less than what the game costs now.

    My gut says that this is not a game for the extremely casual player who is only willing to try the game at a lower cost. In that case, one wonders whether a company that is less focused on F2P as a culture might have made more money with less effort through an expanded/less limited free trial program.

  6. Pingback: Too Long; Didn’t Listen episode 21 — Justin loves Felicia Day